Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) monitoring is a cornerstone of fleet safety management in the trucking industry. An MVR is a state-issued report detailing a driver’s license status, traffic violations, and accidents, and it serves as a key indicator of driver risk. Traditionally, U.S. trucking companies have reviewed MVRs periodically (typically annually, as required by law) to ensure their drivers remain qualified and safe to operate commercial vehicles. However, continuous MVR monitoring – an automated, ongoing review of drivers’ records with near-real-time updates – has emerged as a best practice for enhancing safety, compliance, and financial outcomes. This report delves into the impact of continuous MVR monitoring on safety outcomes, regulatory compliance, and insurance costs for U.S.-based trucking fleets. It also compares continuous monitoring with periodic (e.g. annual or bi-annual) MVR checks, highlighting the advantages and potential drawbacks of each approach. Relevant data, statistics, and case studies are included to illustrate why continuous monitoring is increasingly seen as critical for modern trucking companies.
Impact on Safety Outcomes
Proactive Risk Identification: Continuous MVR monitoring enables trucking companies to identify high-risk driver behavior as soon as it appears on a driving record, rather than waiting months for a scheduled check. This timeliness is crucial because certain violations are strong predictors of future crashes. For example, a driver cited for speeding 15+ mph over the limit is 67% more likely to be involved in a crash within the next year (2022 Driver Safety Statistics Every Company Should Know About). Even seemingly minor infractions can be telling – a study found that failing to use a turn signal (often viewed as a trivial offense) more than doubles a driver’s crash risk (a 112% increase in crash likelihood) in the next 12 months (2022 Driver Safety Statistics Every Company Should Know About). Without continuous monitoring, a carrier might remain unaware of such violations for up to a year, missing the chance for timely intervention to prevent an accident.
Improved Safety Performance: By catching problems early, continuous monitoring allows fleet managers to intervene – through counseling, training, or discipline – before an incident occurs. The result is a measurable improvement in safety outcomes. Industry data and case studies consistently show significant reductions in crashes and violations after implementing continuous MVR checks:
- A robust continuous monitoring program can decrease motor vehicle crash rates by up to 14%, according to industry research (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure). This reduction in crashes means fewer injuries, fatalities, and property damage incidents on the road.
- In one illustrative case study, a large motor carrier that adopted continuous MVR monitoring saw a 40% decrease in on-road incidents after receiving real-time alerts and acting on them. The carrier was able to catch and correct unsafe driving behaviors (that had previously gone unnoticed between annual checks), leading to a 40% improvement in its safety record (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata). This translated to a substantially healthier bottom line for the company.
- SambaSafety (a leading provider of driver monitoring services) reports that organizations using continuous MVR monitoring have achieved a 32% reduction in monthly violations within the first year (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). By the end of 12 months of continuous monitoring combined with targeted driver training, total violations dropped by as much as 77% in one analysis (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). This underscores how ongoing oversight, paired with prompt corrective action, can dramatically improve driver behavior.
- High-risk drivers who would have slipped through the cracks in a periodic-check system can be identified and removed or retrained sooner. It’s well documented that a small fraction of drivers are often responsible for a disproportionate share of accidents. In fact, about 10% of drivers account for 40% of crashes (Continuous Driver Monitoring | DISA). Continuous monitoring helps pinpoint those high-risk individuals quickly, ensuring that “only safe drivers remain on the road” (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3).
Preventative Intervention: With continuous monitoring, fleet managers receive alerts for events like license suspensions, DUIs, excessive speeding, at-fault accidents, and other violations in near real-time (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata) (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata). This prompt visibility means companies can respond immediately – for instance, by pulling a driver off the road if their license is suspended or by enrolling a driver in remedial training after a speeding violation. Quick intervention has a direct safety benefit: it addresses risky behavior before it leads to a crash. As one safety professional noted, continuous monitoring “enables carriers to identify issues before they lead to an accident, or even a license revocation” (How MVR monitoring makes corrective action training more effective). By contrast, under an annual-check system, a driver could be operating unsafely for many months before the issue comes to light, greatly increasing the risk of a serious incident.
Case Example – Keany Produce & Gourmet: A real-world example of safety improvement comes from Keany Produce, a fleet of ~200 trucks in the food transportation business. After adopting a continuous MVR monitoring service, Keany was able to eliminate its reliance on drivers self-reporting violations and catch issues sooner. The outcome was a 37% reduction in violations across its driver base and significantly fewer risky incidents, achieved in tandem with saving about $200,000 in related costs (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). Fewer violations inherently mean a lower likelihood of crashes, illustrating how continuous monitoring tangibly improves safety.
In summary, continuous MVR monitoring creates a proactive safety culture. It closes the information gap, giving trucking companies the ability to react within days (or even hours) of a violation rather than months later. The data shows this leads to fewer accidents and violations, helping protect drivers, the public, and the company’s assets. As one industry resource put it, reducing the time between MVR checks “results in fewer crashes and associated injuries and fatalities.” (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3)
Impact on Regulatory Compliance
Meeting and Exceeding Legal Requirements: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) mandate that motor carriers obtain and review each commercial driver’s MVR at least once every 12 months (49 CFR §391.25). This annual check is a minimum requirement to ensure drivers are qualified and to identify disqualifying offenses or license status changes. Continuous MVR monitoring helps carriers not only meet this obligation but exceed it, thereby tightening compliance. In fact, the FMCSA explicitly recognizes that an Employer Notification Service (ENS) which pushes immediate updates can satisfy the annual MVR inquiry requirement (). Seventeen states have implemented official ENS programs that automatically send employers updates when a driver’s record changes (). In states without such systems, carriers using third-party continuous monitoring still benefit by catching issues early, though they must also pull an official annual MVR to fulfill the letter of the law ().
Avoiding Unfit Drivers and Out-of-Service Violations: Continuous monitoring ensures that driver qualifications are up-to-date at all times, which is critical for compliance. If a driver’s CDL is suspended or revoked, or their medical certification expires, a motor carrier can be notified immediately and take that driver off the road. This prevents scenarios where an unqualified driver continues driving unknowingly, which could result in serious compliance violations and penalties if discovered during a DOT audit or roadside inspection. For example, driving with a suspended CDL or an expired medical card are violations that can put a driver out-of-service and incur fines. Under annual checks, a suspension that occurs right after an annual review might go undetected for up to a year – meaning the company would be unknowingly employing a disqualified driver that whole time (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). As Foley Services warns, if a driver gets a DUI or suspension “a day, week, or month after you pull their annual report,” you could be “in the dark until you run their next annual MVR” or until an auditor discovers those offenses (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). Continuous monitoring closes this compliance gap by alerting the company as soon as such a disqualifying event hits the record.
Protecting CSA Scores and Safety Ratings: Driver violations directly affect a carrier’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores and FMCSA safety rating. Multiple or severe offenses can even trigger a Conditional or Unsatisfactory safety rating for the carrier, which has costly consequences (increased audits, interventions, and difficulty booking loads) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). By catching violations in real-time, continuous MVR monitoring helps fleets address issues before they accumulate and drag down safety metrics. This proactive approach demonstrates a stronger safety management practice. In the words of one industry expert, continuous monitoring “signals a proactive safety stance” (Ongoing MVR monitoring could help carriers avoid big risks). In some jurisdictions like California, employers of commercial drivers are actually required to enroll in continuous record monitoring (the California Employer Pull Notice program) to stay informed of any changes, underlining its importance for compliance.
Liability and “Nuclear Verdict” Prevention: Failing to monitor driver records can expose a company to negligent entrustment claims in the event of a crash. Negligent entrustment lawsuits argue that the employer knew or should have known a driver was unfit (due to a bad driving history) but allowed them to drive anyway. Continuous monitoring provides a strong defense that the company took all reasonable steps to stay aware of its drivers’ qualifications and behaviors. Conversely, relying only on infrequent checks leaves a gap that plaintiffs’ attorneys can exploit. The risk is not theoretical – trucking companies have faced “nuclear verdicts” (jury awards in the tens of millions of dollars) in accidents where an unsafe driver’s history was missed. Statistics show that employers have slim chances of winning such negligent entrustment cases if they occur: up to 79% of employers lose these cases in court (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3). The legal doctrine and recent court outcomes make it clear that regulators and juries expect carriers to be diligent with driver oversight. Proactively monitoring MVRs throughout the year helps prove that diligence and can reduce exposure to massive legal judgments. Moreover, the Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform found that auto accident lawsuits made up nearly 23% of nuclear verdicts in the 2010s, with an average award of $33.8 million (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure). Continuous monitoring, along with proper documentation and intervention, is a key risk management tool to avoid being the next headline.
Documentation for Audits: From a compliance record-keeping standpoint, continuous MVR systems automatically log any changes and the company’s response, creating an audit trail. When the DOT or a state authority conducts a compliance audit, having a continuously updated driver file (with notes of any violations and corrective actions taken) shows a culture of compliance. It demonstrates that the company isn’t just doing the bare minimum annual check, but rather actively managing safety. This can improve the outcome of audits and potentially reduce the likelihood of penalties. The FMCSA emphasizes the “scope and importance of maintaining accurate and updated MVRs to avoid compliance pitfalls and safety hazards” for regulated fleets (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure). In short, continuous monitoring makes continuous compliance feasible – ensuring that at any given moment, you have the latest information on each driver, and you’re not unknowingly violating regulations by letting an unqualified driver behind the wheel.
Impact on Insurance Costs and Claims
Relationship Between Driver Records and Insurance: Insurance companies closely scrutinize a fleet’s safety record and driver MVRs when underwriting policies and setting premiums. For trucking companies, unsafe drivers and frequent violations translate to higher insurance costs. Each traffic violation or at-fault accident on an MVR is a risk indicator that can raise premiums. In extreme cases, a poor safety record can even make a carrier uninsurable or subject to policy cancellation. Industry experts note that insurance providers may drop coverage for fleets that they deem too risky due to unchecked driver violations (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). Conversely, a clean record across the driver pool can help secure better rates. In recent years, trucking insurance premiums have been skyrocketing, driven in part by large verdicts and more accidents – some estimates showed annual commercial auto insurance rates climbing by 6–12% on average (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3). Continuous MVR monitoring is a tool that can help stabilize or reduce insurance expenditures by improving the underlying risk profile of the fleet.
Direct Insurance Premium Benefits: Many insurers recognize the value of continuous monitoring and may offer discounts or incentives to motor carriers that use it. Actively managing driver risk signals to underwriters that the company is proactively reducing the likelihood of claims. According to industry reporting, “many insurers offer discounts to carriers who conduct more frequent MVR monitoring.” (Ongoing MVR monitoring could help carriers avoid big risks) By closing the information gap (no more “surprise” driver violations that go unnoticed for a year), carriers present a better risk, which can translate into lower premiums or smaller rate increases at renewal. Essentially, continuous monitoring is viewed as a positive factor in risk evaluation – similar to how having telematics or driver safety training programs might favorably impact insurance.
Fewer Crashes = Lower Claims: The safety improvements from continuous monitoring (fewer accidents and violations, as discussed earlier) naturally lead to financial gains in terms of reduced claims. Fewer crashes mean fewer expensive insurance claims for property damage, cargo loss, liability, or injury payouts. Over time, a reduction in claims will improve a fleet’s loss history, which is a key driver of premium calculations. One customer success story, again from Keany Produce’s experience, highlights this chain effect. After implementing continuous monitoring and cutting its violation rate by 37%, the company not only saved about $200,000 in administrative and other costs, but “decreased insurance premiums” as well (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). While the case study does not quantify the premium drop, it confirms that the insurer recognized the safer operations. Another large fleet reported that before they adopted continuous monitoring, they often learned about major violations (like a DUI) long after the fact, which meant for six months that driver was unknowingly putting the company at huge risk (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). Now, with continuous oversight, they catch such issues immediately – preventing potential costly incidents and demonstrating responsibility to their insurer.
Avoiding Catastrophic Payouts: The nightmare scenario for any trucking firm is a severe accident that results in multi-million-dollar liability. If that accident involves a driver who should not have been on the road (due to a suspended license, a recent DUI, or a pattern of egregious violations that the company missed), the financial fallout can be devastating. Not only would the carrier face a nuclear verdict lawsuit, but insurance might not cover punitive damages, and the settlement could exceed policy limits. Continuous MVR monitoring substantially lowers this risk by helping ensure no driver with a disqualifying record is kept in service unknowingly. In the long run, the cost of a continuous monitoring program is trivial compared to the potential cost of a single catastrophic crash that could have been prevented by removing a high-risk driver. As one insurance advisory notes, a strong MVR monitoring program is a proven way to decrease crashes and thus avoid the huge costs associated with them (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure). In fact, keeping unsafe drivers off the road is not just about avoiding claims – it can protect a company from nuclear verdicts that are driving insurance premiums ever higher in the trucking sector.
Financial ROI of Continuous Monitoring: While continuous MVR services usually involve subscription fees, the return on investment is seen in multiple areas: fewer fines and violations (saving money on penalties), fewer crashes (saving on deductibles and claim payouts), stable or lower insurance premiums, and even indirect savings like less vehicle downtime and lower legal expenses. Some continuous monitoring providers highlight that their clients have saved significant sums – one large fleet cited a $50,000 reduction in administrative costs after switching from manual annual MVR pulls to automated monitoring (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). Add to this the potential insurance savings (some fleets cannot even renew coverage without demonstrating stronger controls like continuous MVR checks, given today’s insurance climate), and it becomes clear that continuous monitoring is as much a financial risk management strategy as it is a safety tool.
Continuous vs. Periodic MVR Checks: A Comparison
To better understand the value of continuous MVR monitoring, it is useful to compare it side-by-side with periodic MVR checks (such as annual or semi-annual pulls). Below is a summary of the key differences, advantages, and disadvantages of each approach for trucking companies:
| Aspect | Periodic MVR Checks (Annual or Bi-Annual) | Continuous MVR Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Checks | Infrequent, scheduled reviews (typically once a year per driver, or at most quarterly for proactive fleets). | Ongoing, automated review of driver records year-round. Updates are pushed whenever a change occurs on a driver’s record. |
| Timeliness of Information | Delayed – There can be a gap of up to 12 months (or whatever the interval) between a violation occurring and the employer discovering it. For example, waiting 365 days between checks means long periods of unknown risk (Ongoing MVR monitoring could help carriers avoid big risks – LinkedIn). | Immediate – Notifications of new violations, license suspensions, revocations, or other changes are received in near real-time, often within days of the state recording the event ([The importance of continuous driver record monitoring |
| Safety Risk Exposure | Higher risk exposure. A driver with dangerous behavior (e.g., a DUI, reckless driving charge, or license suspension) could continue driving unchecked for months. The company may only find out after an incident has already happened. This reactive model can “leave you in the dark” about critical safety problems (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). | Lower risk exposure. Continuous monitoring closes the blind spots. High-risk drivers are identified before they cause a crash, enabling the company to intervene or remove the driver promptly. This proactive model has been linked to fewer crashes and up to double-digit percentage reductions in incidents (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure). |
| Regulatory Compliance | Meets the minimum FMCSA requirement (annual MVR check) but nothing more. If an issue arises in between checks, the carrier could inadvertently be non-compliant (e.g., unknowingly using a medically unqualified or suspended driver for months). Reliance is often on drivers to self-report interim violations, which many do not do. | Exceeds minimum compliance. Keeps carriers continually compliant with the spirit of safety regulations. It provides evidence of “continuous oversight” which regulators encourage (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025). In states with Employer Notification Systems, continuous updates fulfill the annual check requirement automatically (). Overall, it greatly reduces the chance of a surprise non-compliance discovery (since issues are caught and addressed quickly). |
| Insurance Impact | Offers little leverage in insurance negotiations beyond showing an acceptable basic safety program. Insurers know that annual checks can miss a lot in between. A single unchecked bad driver can cause a premium spike if they have a loss. There are generally no discounts for merely doing the required annual checks – that’s expected baseline behavior. | Viewed positively by insurers and often rewarded with lower premiums or discounts (Ongoing MVR monitoring could help carriers avoid big risks). Demonstrates a proactive safety culture which improves the fleet’s risk profile (Ongoing MVR monitoring could help carriers avoid big risks). Over time, fewer accidents and claims under continuous monitoring help stabilize or reduce insurance costs. Some fleets have directly seen premium reductions after adopting continuous programs (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety). |
| Administrative Effort | High burden in bursts. Collecting and reviewing MVRs for an entire fleet once or twice a year can be labor-intensive. For example, reviewing 200 drivers’ records manually could take around a full work week of staff time (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3). There is also risk of human error in interpreting records or missing trends when done manually in bulk. | Lower burden, spread out over time. Continuous monitoring services automate the data collection and often highlight only the changes or negative findings, which is far more efficient. One estimate shows a 15 minutes per driver administrative saving when using monitoring versus annual batch pulls ([MVR Driver Record Monitoring |
| Cost Structure | Typically pay-per-pull. Each MVR request has a fee (averaging ~$10-12, varying by state). Checking more frequently (e.g., quarterly) multiplies these costs. For instance, a fleet of 200 drivers doing quarterly checks might spend roughly $8,800/year in state fees (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3). Smaller fleets that stick to annual checks pay less in fees, but incur the safety and risk trade-offs. | Typically subscription-based per driver (a flat monthly or annual fee for continuous coverage). This can be more cost-effective than frequent manual pulls, especially for larger fleets. Many find that real-time monitoring ends up cheaper than quarterly MVR pulls when considering both direct fees and labor costs saved (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3) (WHITE PAPER-MVR-V3). The predictable flat fee also aids budgeting, and the prevention of even one costly accident or legal claim can offset years of monitoring fees. |
| Driver Behavior and Culture | Drivers may feel less oversight day-to-day, knowing that unless they self-report, the company won’t see a violation until the next scheduled check. This could (in the worst cases) lead some to be complacent about minor violations, figuring they can “get away with it” for a while. However, good drivers might appreciate the low intrusion during the year. | Drivers are aware that any ticket or license change will quickly come to the company’s attention. This can encourage safer driving habits consistently, as there is no “grace period” to hide infractions. Companies can integrate continuous monitoring with reward and coaching programs – e.g., recognizing safe driving records or promptly coaching after a violation. Clear policies and communication are needed so drivers understand the monitoring is about safety, not distrust. |
Advantages of Continuous Monitoring: As the comparison highlights, continuous MVR monitoring offers substantial advantages in reducing risk exposure, enhancing compliance, and improving administrative efficiency. It essentially provides peace of mind that you won’t be caught off-guard by a driver’s hidden violation or lapse in qualifications. The ability to respond to issues in real-time is invaluable in preventing accidents and avoiding liability. Furthermore, continuous programs often come with user-friendly software dashboards, automatic recordkeeping, and integration with other fleet management tools (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata) (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata), making the process seamless for administrators.
Advantages of Periodic Checks (and Limitations): The main (and perhaps only) advantage of sticking with periodic MVR checks is simplicity and potentially lower direct cost for very small fleets. For a tiny trucking company with, say, 1–5 drivers who are well-known to the owner, manual annual checks might be manageable and low-cost. Additionally, some companies might have privacy or trust concerns about continuous monitoring, though modern services are designed to handle data securely and in compliance with privacy laws (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata) (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata). However, even small operators carry the full liability of any accident their driver might cause, so the risk of not knowing a problem in real-time often outweighs the modest expense of continuous monitoring. In practice, periodic checks alone leave significant gaps; as one safety consultant bluntly asked: if you’re only pulling MVRs annually, “how quickly are you able to intervene after a violation occurs?” (2022 Driver Safety Statistics Every Company Should Know About). The answer, unfortunately, is “not very quickly” – which is why more frequent monitoring is strongly recommended across the industry (What’s Motor Vehicle Record Monitoring? – Embark Safety).
Conclusion
For U.S.-based trucking companies, continuous MVR monitoring has moved from a “nice-to-have” option to a critical component of a comprehensive safety and compliance strategy. The data makes a compelling case: real-time visibility into driver records improves safety outcomes by enabling immediate interventions that prevent accidents. It ensures regulatory compliance is maintained rigorously, closing the loopholes that can lead to unqualified drivers being on the road. And it yields financial benefits in the form of lower insurance risk, potential premium savings, and avoidance of costly crashes and lawsuits. In contrast, periodic MVR checks (whether annual or semi-annual) simply cannot provide the same level of protection – they are a retrospective snapshot (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) that can quickly become outdated, leaving a carrier blind to developing risks (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety).
Trucking companies that have embraced continuous MVR monitoring, from large fleets to smaller operators, report stronger safety records and peace of mind. They can identify high-risk drivers and either coach them or take them off the road before disaster strikes. They also send a message to their drivers, regulators, and business partners that safety is truly the top priority, year-round, not just at annual review time. As one fleet safety manager put it, continuous MVR monitoring “minimize[s] the risk of having unsafe drivers behind the wheel,” providing an unmatched level of insight and helping standardize safety across the company (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety).
In today’s environment of nuclear verdicts, rising insurance premiums, and ever-stricter safety expectations, continuous monitoring isn’t just about checking a compliance box – it’s about actively managing risk. The cost of the technology has become affordable (often offset by savings elsewhere), and the ROI in terms of lives saved, injuries avoided, and dollars protected is substantial. For trucking companies looking to thrive, adopting continuous MVR monitoring is a prudent investment in both safety and success. In summary, continuous MVR monitoring is critical because it helps ensure that every driver operating under your authority is properly licensed, compliant, and safe every single day, not just on the day of their annual review. The road to safety is continuous, and now, so is the monitoring that upholds it.
Sources:
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Employer Notification Service (ENS) guidance () ()
- SambaSafety, 2022 Driver Safety Statistics – Crash Prediction Study (2022 Driver Safety Statistics Every Company Should Know About) (2022 Driver Safety Statistics Every Company Should Know About)
- Cardata, Continuous Driver Record Monitoring Case Study (The importance of continuous driver record monitoring | Cardata)
- SambaSafety, Continuous MVR Monitoring – Customer Results (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety) (Continuous MVR Monitoring Services from SambaSafety)
- DISA (in partnership with SambaSafety), Continuous Driver Monitoring Overview (Continuous Driver Monitoring | DISA)
- Foley Services, Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional (2025) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025) (Why Continuous MVR Monitoring Isn’t Optional for Employers in 2025)
- Amerisure Insurance, Guide to MVR Management (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure) (Steering Towards Safety: The Essential Guide to MVR Management – Amerisure)
- Verified Credentials, Benefits of Continuous MVR Monitoring (MVR Driver Record Monitoring | Verified Credentials) (MVR Driver Record Monitoring | Verified Credentials)
- FreightWaves (via Yahoo Finance), Ongoing MVR Monitoring Could Help Carriers Avoid Big Risks
